Wednesday, December 19, 2007

I'm Nothing if not persistant!

Resident found guilty of harassing firefighter

A Wall man was found guilty in municipal court last Thursday of harassing the Glendola fire captain in September 2006.

Robert Fuhr, 32, of Belmar Boulevard, originally faced other charges but was found guilty of only two — careless driving and harassment.

Monmouth County Municipal Courts Presiding Judge John G. Colannino heard the case Thursday morning after Wall Municipal Court Judge Thomas Brennan recused himself from the case.

Judge Brennan did not provide a reason for recusing himself, nor is he required to provide a reason, according to Wall Township Municipal Prosecutor Joseph Defino, who tried the case.

On Sept. 13, 2006, Capt. Christopher Rosenfeld, who is a full-time firefighter with the Glendola Fire Dept., stated that, at approximately 10 a.m., he was traveling in a marked Glendola Fire Dept. pick-up truck at the intersection of Allenwood Road and Belmar Boulevard when he noticed Mr. Fuhr, traveling toward his vehicle on the opposite side of the roadway.

As the two vehicles passed, according to Capt. Rosenfeld, he noticed Mr. Fuhr “hanging out his window screaming.” The captain described Mr. Fuhr as someone who was “very agitated,” “shaking their fist” and “displaying the middle finger.”

Riverside-based attorney Jeffrey E. Snow, who was representing Mr. Fuhr, asked Capt. Rosenfeld if he had made any hand gestures to Mr. Fuhr as their two vehicles passed one another at the intersection. The captain replied that he had only “waved hello.”

Capt. Rosenfeld said that he and Mr. Fuhr were friends and socialized when the two were younger but had lost touch with one another over the years. The two men both grew up in Wall Township.

Because of this previous relationship, Capt. Rosenfeld said he was unsure why his old acquaintance reacted in such a negative demeanor towards him on the roadway.

According to Mr. Fuhr’s testimony, however, it was Capt. Rosenfeld who displayed his middle finger towards him.

“The hand gesture was unusual,” Mr. Fuhr stated. “I didn’t see the need for it.”

Approximately one hour later on Belmar Boulevard, the two vehicles passed each other once again.

The Glendola Fire House is located on Belmar Boulevard, only a short distance away from where Mr. Fuhr lives on the same road.

Mr. Fuhr, who runs his own plumbing company, operates the business out of his home.

This time, said Capt. Rosenfeld, Mr. Fuhr had turned his vehicle around on Grace Street, then proceeded to get behind the fire truck and actually pass him on the roadway.

Capt. Rosenfeld then lost sight of the vehicle a short time thereafter. The captain had assumed Mr. Fuhr turned into the driveway of his home on Belmar Boulevard.

As he made his way down Belmar Boulevard at the posted speed limit, Capt. Rosenfeld said, he came upon Mr. Fuhr’s vehicle in the area of Mr. Fuhr’s residence.

Here, the testimony differs between the two men as to exactly what happened.

As Capt. Rosenfeld approached Mr. Fuhr’s vehicle from behind on Belmar Boulevard, “I applied them [the brakes] lightly twice in a manner it would make my brake lights flash,” but not so the vehicle’s speed would be affected, Mr. Fuhr stated. He said he did this “to warn Mr. Rosenfeld I was going to be turning into my driveway.” Mr. Fuhr said he normally does this when approaching his driveway.

Even though he checked his brakes twice by tapping on them, Mr. Fuhr said Capt. Rosenfeld’s truck was “within three to five feet” behind his own.

Capt. Rosenfeld stated that not only did Mr. Fuhr check his brakes two times, but that he had slammed on his brakes a third time causing the captain to slam on his own brakes and skid into the shoulder of the road to avoid crashing into the back of Mr. Fuhr’s van.

Capt. Rosenfeld said he was traveling a safe distance behind Mr. Fuhr, and driving the speed limit, but Mr. Fuhr’s sudden stops on the busy roadway were unforeseen.

Capt. Rosenfeld had faced the charges of following too closely and careless driving, after a civil complaint was filed against the captain by Mr. Fuhr.

Both charges were dropped by the court since it was determined that the testimony of Mr. Fuhr was insufficient to prove that Capt. Rosenfeld had actually committed those driving infractions, as alleged by Mr. Fuhr.

Mr. Fuhr had originally faced four charges — backing up on a roadway, delaying traffic, harassment and reckless driving.

Judge Colannino dismissed the charge of backing in the roadway since none of the testimony that morning stated Mr. Fuhr had committed that act.

On the charge of delaying traffic, Mr. Snow argued that the statute states no vehicle’s “condition be constructed or loaded to delay traffic to man, beast or property.”

Though Mr. Fuhr may have been delaying Mr. Rosenfeld’s travel by checking his brakes, his vehicle was not loaded in a way to cause a traffic delay, thus the charge was dropped by the judge.

On the harassment charge, Judge Colannino said it was “a classic case of conduct” designed to seriously annoy or harm Capt. Rosenfeld.

“There has been testimony there has been repeated acts,” the judge stated.

“I find it incredible … that two light taps on his brakes were sufficient to slow down a large van to make it sufficient to turn into the driveway,” stated the judge. “That was the beginning of my doubts to the voracity of Mr. Fuhr’s testimony,” adding that he did not believe Capt. Rosenfeld made an offensive gesture towards Mr. Fuhr on the roadway.

“There is a common thread that Mr. Fuhr did something,” stressed the judge, further stating that Mr. Fuhr admitted to tapping on his brakes twice.

“I find it is more credible Mr. Fuhr did something with his brakes uncalled for,” stated Judge Colannino, “to put Mr. Rosenfeld in danger and did so in a careless manner.”

The judge also said he believes Mr. Fuhr intentionally turned around on Belmar Boulevard upon seeing Capt. Rosenfeld pass him on the roadway. “That rises to the level of harassment,” Judge Colannino said.

Mr. Defino asked the court to impose harsh penalties upon Mr. Fuhr, stating, “The acts themselves placed Capt. Rosenfeld in a dangerous situation.

“The court should impose a fine and suspend his license for 30 days,” the prosecutor added.

Judge Colannino fined Mr. Fuhr $400 on the count of harassment and $256 for careless driving.

There is also a no contact order that was previously issued by the Wall court stating that Mr. Fuhr is to have no contact with any Wall officials. Judge Colannino stayed the no contact order.

Mr. Defino said although the court did not impose the suspension of Mr. Fuhr’s license, he would “stand by the court’s decision.”

Capt. Rosenfeld was represented by Michael Hobbie, of Eatontown, who said he was “very satisfied” with the outcome of the trial at the conclusion of the three-hour hearing.

Though Mr. Fuhr said he was “grateful” for a “civil trial,” he did admit that he was “disappointed” with the verdicts.

Capt. Rosenfeld’s brother, John, who is also a full time firefighter with the Glendola Fire Dept., has also alleged he has been the victim of harassment by Mr. Fuhr.

In that case, Mr. Fuhr was arrested on Sept. 15, 2006 and charged with aggravated assault in the fourth degree and harassment for allegedly swerving his vehicle into the oncoming lane on Sixteenth Avenue. John Rosenfeld was driving in a marked fire vehicle on Sixteenth Avenue when Mr. Fuhr allegedly swerved in front of him.

A court date has not yet been set for that trial.

Thursday, August 16, 2007

I am the BEST at harassment!! From neighbors to local firefighters! No one is safe!

Wall man sentenced to 21 days in jail for harassing neighbors

Is free after five days pending appeal

A Wall Township resident was found guilty in Wall Township Municipal Court Aug. 9 and sent directly to the county jail for 21 days for harassing his neighbors, but was released Aug. 14 after an appeal was heard in Superior Court.

Robert Fuhr, 33, of Belmar Boulevard, was sentenced by Wall Township Municipal Court Judge Thomas Brennan to serve 21 days in the Monmouth County Correctional Institution, Freehold. A no contact order was also issued which states that Mr. Fuhr is not to have any contact with his neighbors upon his release.

Wall Township Court Administrator Gail Connors said Mr. Fuhr was found guilty of one count of harassment, which included “burning large fires, creating excessive smoke, positioning spotlights on the victims’ house, tailgating the victim, and grabbing his genitals in an offensive manner as the victim drove past his house.”

The victim, Christine Szodoray, also of Belmar Boulevard, testified at last Thursday’s trial.

When reached by telephone, Mrs. Szodoray said she did not want to comment on the matter.

Mr. Fuhr, who pleaded not guilty to the charges, was represented by attorney William Buckman, of Moorestown, and co-council Jeffrey Snow, of Riverside.

Mr. Buckman said his client’s sentence was appealed in Monmouth County Superior Court and Judge Betty Uhrbacher released his client Tuesday afternoon pending the appeal on $200 bail.

Mr. Buckman said, “It does not surprise me I got Robert out of jail.”

Mr. Buckman said there was a “bias on the part of the [Wall Township Municipal] court to get Fuhr into jail.” He did not explain why he believes such a bias exists.

“The judge, for whatever reasons, placed Robert Fuhr in jail knowing he could get out under appeal,” said Mr. Buckman, adding his client was “unduly punished and stripped of any rights.”

It was “inappropriate” of the court to sentence Mr. Fuhr to serve 21 days for a “petty disorderly persons offense.” Mr. Buckman said the charge is “akin to spitting on the street.”

On Sept. 9, 2006, Wall Township Police Lt. Robert Brice, Sgt. John Brockreide and Ptl. Jason Costantini responded to Mr. Fuhr’s house based on a complaint from Mrs. Szodoray’s husband, George Szodoray, about excessive smoke on their property and in their house from an open fire at Mr. Fuhr residence, according to the police event report.

The report also states that Mr. Fuhr had a “large oil tank … with the top cut off” in which he was “burning large logs and branches in.” The report continues, “There was no top or screen on the oil tank, and ash continuously came out onto me and the other officers, who were 15-20 feet away. Fuhr agreed to move his burning operation to the middle of the yard, away from the property line.”

Only one day later, on Sept. 10, police were called to the Szodoray residence for a complaint by Mrs. Szodoray, who, according to that day’s event report, stated that as Ms. Szodoray drove by Mr. Fuhr, “he reached down and grabbed [sp] his testicles.”

In a Sept. 3, 2006 police event report, Mr. Szodoray had called the police because Mr. Fuhr had a “high power spotlamp aimed at his home.”

The report goes on to state that the officer saw the lights “aimed directly at the complaintant’s home and property in a completely unnecessary manner and which appeared to serve no legitimate purpose.”

When asked by the officer what the purpose of the spotlight was, Mr. Fuhr responded, “so that he could ‘hear persons entering’ his perimeter.”

On May 18, at 6:30 a.m., police responded to the Szodoray residence after another complaint was made by Mr. Szodoray that “flood lamps were directed at his home.” It is noted in the police report that, “Rear flood lamps were noted as on, however, it was undetermined the direction of the lamps due to the morning light” and Mr. Szodoray was advised to contact the police “if the lights are on again during the dark hours.”

Later that same day, at 10:50 p.m., another call was made by Mr. Szodoray in regards to the flood lamps, according to police reports. It is noted in the event report that, “Patrols document that spot lights from neighbor Robert Fuhr are positioned toward” the Szodoray residence.

When asked if the allegations against his client are valid, Mr. Buckman said the “evidence is overwhelming it didn’t happen.”

Mr. Buckman also stated that a cross-complaint was filed by Mr. Fuhr against the Szodorays for harassment but Judge

Brennan refused to hear it.

The Szodorays have “continuously, frivolously, called the police against him [Mr. Fuhr] without basis,” said Mr. Buckman, so Mr. Fuhr “filed against them for harassment, as well.”

The attorney said that the Szodorays are engaged in a “campaign to harass” Mr. Fuhr and have been “improperly calling the police to his house.”

When asked for comment regarding the case, Wall Police Lt. Gerald Ihnken said, “We file charges, we make arrests, we testify, and the court makes a decision.” He would not comment further on the matter.

Mr. Buckman also stated that Mr. Fuhr has a pending case against him involving two Glendola Fire Department No. 1 officials, Chris and John Rosenfeld, who allege they have also been the victims of harassment by Mr. Fuhr. Mr. Buckman stated Mr. Fuhr also alleges the Rosenfelds have harassed him.

David Shotwell, of Ocean Grove, is the attorney representing the fire department in the matter.

“I cannot comment because it does involve a law enforcement investigation,” Mr. Shotwell said. He directed all inquiries to the Monmouth County Prosecutor’s Office or the New Jersey State Police.

Monmouth County Prosecutor Luis Valentin said on Monday he would look into the matter.

New Jersey State Police Sgt. Stephen Jones, the public information officer, did not return a phone call as of press time.

In that case, Mr. Fuhr was arrested on Sept. 15, 2006 and charged with aggravated assault in the fourth degree and harassment for allegedly swerving his vehicle into the oncoming lane on Sixteenth Avenue. John Rosenfeld was driving in a marked fire vehicle on Sixteenth Avenue when Mr. Fuhr swerved in front of him.

Mr. Fuhr was arrested as a result of the incident. As per the terms and conditions of his release, former Wall Township Municipal Court Judge Evan Broadbelt had stipulated that Mr. Fuhr was not to have any contact with any Wall Township official.

As recently as Aug. 4, John Rosenfeld, who is the Assistant Fire Chief for the Glendola Fire Dept., reported to police that Mr. Fuhr was “sitting in a Jeep Liberty videotaping Station 2 [Glendola] actively responding to a vehicle fire on the Parkway” according to the event report.

The event report further states that, “Rosenfeld stated that he observed, who he believed to be a one Robert Fuhr sitting in the driver seat of his vehicle holding a videotape pointed at the fire trucks response.”

When Mr. Buckman was asked if his client broke the order to stay away from Wall officials in the Aug. 4 incident, he replied, “Videotaping someone is not having any contact with them,” and further stated, “Videotaping them would not be contact.”

There are a number of other instances where Mr. Fuhr has been accused of videotaping — such as the May 19 event report that states John Rosenfeld was attending a party and that “Robert Fuhr [was] operating a green Jeep Liberty [and] pulled up … and videotaped him,” and a July 7 report where the officer investigated a complaint that Mr. Fuhr was seen “videotaping WTPD [Wall Township Police Department] units” during a noise complaint response.

Mr. Buckman said he is representing Mr. Fuhr in this case, as well.

A court date has not yet been set for that case said Wall Township Municipal Joseph Prosecutor Defino.

Thursday, June 7, 2007

Another little slice of Robert Fuhr for my fans!

Wall Township Police blotter

The Coast Star, 06.07.07 / News Article / Last modified: 06.13.07 at 11:58 AM

Wall Township Chief of Police David Morris reported the following recent police activity in the township:

• On May 17, Robert W. Fuhr, 33, of Belmar Boulevard in Wall, was arrested on Allaire Road by Ptl. Dan Mason and charged with contempt in the fourth degree.